The Specificity Paradox: Why Specific Details Reach More People
Most creators try to be universal.
They write about love.
They write about heartbreak.
They write about fear, ambition, and freedom.
Big themes. Big words. Big emotions.
And somehow the result feels small.
Generic.
Replaceable.
When I first started writing music, I had the same issues I had with my manuscripts. My language was vague and distant. I did a lot of telling and not enough showing. I would repeat myself often.
All while exploring big themes, big words, and big emotions. But my lyrics would always feel generic and replaceable.
Not at all what I wanted.
Through trial and error, I realized something.
And here’s the paradox:
The more specific the emotion, the more universal the response.
When you stop trying to speak to everyone, you finally reach someone.
And when you reach someone deeply enough, you reach everyone.
Music: One Line, One Memory
Think about the songs that stay with you.
They rarely say, “I am heartbroken.”
They say something like:
You left your hoodie on the back of my chair.
I still check my phone at 2:17 a.m.
The kitchen light was still on when you walked out.
These lines are small. Personal. Almost private.
Yet listeners attach themselves to them.
Why?
Because the brain responds to detail.
When you write, “I miss you every day,” the mind has nothing to grab onto.
When you write, “I still sleep on your side of the bed,” the mind sees a room. It sees the bed. It remembers its own version of that moment.
Precision creates imagery.
Imagery creates memory.
Memory creates emotion.
As a songwriter, this should change how you approach your craft.
Instead of writing the hook first, write the scene.
What time was it?
What object was in the room?
What exact sentence ended the conversation?
Replace emotional labels with events.
Do not say, “I felt alone.”
Show me the empty chair.
You are not telling people what to feel.
You are giving them something to see.
And once they see it, they feel it.
Literature: Texture Beats Thesis
The same principle applies to prose.
Writers often rely on summaries.
She was anxious.
He was devastated.
They were deeply in love.
These are conclusions. Not experiences.
Readers connect to texture.
Her hands shake as she tries to unlock the door.
He rereads the same sentence three times and still does not process it.
They sit on opposite ends of the couch, knees not touching.
Specificity pulls readers into the body of the scene.
Abstract language stays in the head.
Sensory detail moves into the nervous system.
When you write essays, especially reflective ones, you face the same trap.
You can say, “Launching my product was stressful.”
Or you can say, “I refreshed the sales dashboard every six minutes and told myself not to.”
One statement is a summary.
The other is a moment.
Moments build credibility.
Specificity signals honesty.
Abstract declarations create distance. Concrete detail creates trust.
Technology: Precision Solves Problems
This is not only about art.
Precision scales in code.
Think about vague problem statements.
The app is slow.
The login is broken.
Users are confused.
These statements feel urgent, but they are useless.
Now add precision.
The dashboard takes 4.3 seconds to load after authentication.
OAuth tokens expire after 15 minutes without refresh.
Users abandon checkout on the shipping step.
Now you have something to work with.
Precision narrows chaos into action.
As a developer, I have felt this.
Bugs remain mysterious when the problem is fuzzy.
Once you define the exact condition that triggers the error, the solution becomes visible.
Clear problem statements outperform clever solutions.
You do not need brilliance first.
You need clarity.
Music demands emotional clarity.
Literature demands narrative clarity.
Technology demands logical clarity.
In every case, precision multiplies impact.
Why This Works
The brain searches for anchors.
Specific details create anchors.
An anchor gives the audience something stable to attach their own experience to.
If you say, “I felt lost,” there is no anchor.
If you say, “I sat in the parking lot for twenty minutes because I did not want to go inside,” the reader remembers their own parking lot.
Your detail becomes their memory.
That is the paradox.
Specificity feels narrow to the creator.
It feels risky. Too personal. Too small. But specificity grows in the audience’s mind. It invites projection.
Precision scales because the human brain fills in the gaps.
The Discipline of Precision
Precision is not an accident.
It is a discipline.
For music:
Before writing the hook, write the room.
Describe one object.
Name the time.
Capture one line of dialogue.
For literature:
Replace abstract nouns with actions.
Cut generalizations.
Add one lived detail to every major paragraph.
For technology:
Rewrite vague feature requests.
Add numbers.
Add constraints.
Add conditions.
Instead of “improve performance,” define acceptable load time.
Instead of “make it user-friendly,” define the friction point.
Precision forces you to observe instead of declare.
It requires attention.
And attention is rare.
The Strategic Edge
Most creators chase universality.
They want reach. Scale. Mass appeal. So they dilute. They sand down the edges of their story. But the edge is the point.
A precise emotion travels further than a vague one.
A clear bug report gets fixed faster than a dramatic complaint.
A detailed scene gets remembered longer than a thesis.
If you want your music to resonate, choose one memory. If you want your writing to land, choose one moment. If you want your product to improve, choose one measurable problem.
For those who know me personally, much of what I write is infused with bits and pieces of my own life.
For example, in Sail Away (A Short Story), both Hunter and I are reading “Crime and Punishment.” And we both have a friend in IT we haven’t spoken to in a while.
It’s just natural, when you do it right, that pieces of yourself should make their way into your finished work.
Creation doesn’t happen in a vacuum. The more details you use to your advantage, the more people will see themselves in the work.
So remember: The more specific you become, the more people recognize themselves.
Precision does not shrink your audience.
It sharpens your signal.
And sharp signals travel far.
The write the room before the hook idea is going to stick with me. I’ve definitely tried to land the big emotional line too early instead of building the scene that earns it. Those small lines like the hoodie on the chair and the time on the clock are the stuff people actually remember. It feels riskier to be that specific but I can see how it makes the emotion more believable. I’m going to work on putting more specifics into my songwriting so thank you for this perspective Idris Elijah and enjoy your weekend!
The distinction between conclusions and experiences was so well done. I’ve caught myself writing things like “she was overwhelmed” and calling it depth. It’s not. The reminder to replace abstraction with action feels simple but not easy. That parking lot example is exactly the kind of detail that turns a sentence into something you feel in your body. This sharpened my eye in a useful way so thank you Idris Elijah for such a well written topic today! Have a great weekend!!